Skip to content

Many countries with religiously backed governments have oppr

Do you have a similar question? Our professional writers have done a similar paper in past. Give Us your instructions and wait for a professional assignment!        

Many countries with religiously backed governments have oppressed… Many countries with religiously backed governments have oppressed minorities. Do you believe that a secular government would solve this problem for those countries? Why???????South Asia includes the countries of Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, and Maldives. The countries have a history of similar cultural beliefs, but over recent years religion has divided some of the regions.?????It wasn’t until the 1980s when Hindu nationalism became a part of India’s government identity. ?Before that, Hinduism was the main identity of South Asia for about a thousand years, but India had remained a secular and impartial government.???? It wasn’t until around 1300 when Islam ruled much of South Asia, then in the 16th and 17th centuries, Islam dominated the region under the Mughal Empire.?Eventually, these Muslim majorities became smaller and currently make up the current countries of Pakistan and Bangladesh.?????According to the PBS broadcast, “Religious Violence between Hindus and Muslims in Western India”, the conflict between Hindus and Muslims began many years ago. According to some, this tension started when a group of Muslims set a train on fire which was transporting a group of Hindu activists and killed many of the passengers.?Years after that incident, in 1992, a group of Hindu militants burned down a mosque where they said was the site of an ancient temple. Since that time, this tension has continued within India.???? According to The New York Times article, “The Roots of the Delhi Riots: A Fiery Speech and an Ultimatum”, this Hindu against Muslim aggression is a very real and present situation today.?Just as this article was written in 2020, there was a case were at least 25 people shot dead because of this aggression.?The aggressor in this case was an elite Hindu man who had lost an election.?In order to get his supporters to become agitated, he spoke out against Muslims.?A violent and destructive riot occurred, pitting Hindus against Muslims.?Since Hindus are the majority in India and rule the political arena in most cases, the Hindu agitator didn’t receive any punishment.In many of the cases, it has been the majority lead Hindus to agitate and bring on violence to the Muslim community.?The Hindus, especially in India, feel more empowered because of the control they reign in the region. However, it seems to be the radical leaders on both sides who escalate these conflicts.Creating a national identity is made difficult because of the radical believers on either side that don’t want to see similarities.?This case is seen throughout the world where it’s a majority against minorities.?Even if the majority of both sides want peace and unity, it always seems the small number of radicals on all sides make the loudest noise.?We see this with Israel and the Palestinians, and with so many other groups in all regions of the world.From the articles that have been cited, the agitators are usually labeled as “mobs”, “militants”, or “radicals” who are energizing groups of people to inflict violence and destruction to the “enemy”.?The fact that the government of India no longer identifies as a “neutral” government implies that they will continue to have a bias towards those who have similar beliefs of those in power.?T?Earth ScienceScienceGeographyGE 132

Get a plagiarism-free order today   we guarantee confidentiality and a professional paper and we will meet the deadline.    

Leave a Reply

Order a plagiarism free paper today. Get 20% off your first order!

X